Цитата:от:vesakov
Для тех кого интересует сравнительное большей частью в цифрах размытие фона компактами, бз и зеркалками рекомендую статью
http://www.dpreview.com/articles/6091822765/background-blur-and-its-relationship-to-sensor-sizeПодробнее
Спасибо, почитал... интересно.
Несколько затруднился с переводом последнего абзаца
Cameras which at least provide some capabilities to create decent background blur
Cameras like the Panasonic LX7 or the Olympus XZ-2 (and XZ-1), are better designed as they make use of faster lenses at telephoto.
The Sony RX100 unfortunately lacks a faster lens, but compensates this with a larger sensor providing similar capabilities like the LX7 and XZ-2. An additional plus is that the larger sensor potentially offers better noise performance
Как понятно из перевода RX100 обеспечивает тот же результат что и LX7 XZ-2 XZ-1 на теле, но шумов меньше
The Canon G15 now got a faster lens compared to the G12. With respect to background blur it is not much different from the Canon G1 X, which has a larger sensor, but a slower lens. The Nikon P7700 is very similar to the Canon G15, having a slower lens but also a longer zoom range (please note that I did not have the actual f-number at 85mm equivalent and most likely its better than 4.0).
FourThirds cameras using standard kit lenses are somewhat limited in their ability to create background blur, but the system offers a variety of faster lenses and longer zooms, which improves the situation signifcantly (like e.g. the 45mm 1:1.8)
Почему они толкуют про "faster lens", или есть более правильное толкование faster как быстрый?
Вывод понятен - полная матрица лучше. :D
", но для матрицы побольше.
